lifeinthemix2.co.uk
LIFEINTHEMIX 2.CO.UK

Common Purpose. What is this highly secretive Marxist controller of almost all our democratic systems?

SHOUT LOUD

SHOUT LOUD

 

 

                   COMMON PURPOSE

        GOVERNMENT INFILTRAITORS

 

                                                                                                                    URGENT MESSAGE

To undertake this action I need funding. They have already destroyed my means of earning and are currently acting on a massive scale to destroy my good self so I can no longer contiue  this work. I therefore request donations to help me help our country.

                                                 A BIG THANKS TO THOSE WHO HAVE DONATED

                                                                                                          

                      IS THIS COMMON PURPOSE MOVING INTO CYBERSPACE

                   Please contact me at : Lifeinthemix22@yahoo.com  to arrange a means of donation. 

 

 

Here is I and others getting extremely excited about a charity that most of you have never or only recently heard of, never the less, excited is exactly the right action to be taken in relation to this very sinister operation...It is destroying our Blighty and all countries of Europe and all former [I say that lightly] colonies.

Thanks to an extremely courageous and determined gentleman and his colleagues, we have now a lot of information to work with and the battle so to speak has just begun. There is no better way to understand the aim, strategy, and means, of this Marxist operation than through Brian Gerrish, in his two lectures in video format, so without any further a do take time out and begin to understand what makes these people tick :

 

 

       BRIAN GERRISH LEICESTER LECTURE ON COMMON PURPOSE JUNE 21 2008

 

   BRIAN GERRISH BOURNMOUTH LECTURE ON COMMON PURPOSE JUNE 28 2008

 

                   BRIAN GERRISH SECOND BOURNMOUTH LECTURE  JULY 1 2008

 

                  SOME BIG NAMES PAYING HOMAGE TO COMMON PURPOSE

 

                          COMMON PURPOSE SEXUALISING CHILDREN AGE SIX 

 

            CHARLOTTE ISERBYT-DELIBERATE DUMBING DOWN OF THE WORLD

                  NO VACCINATION.. NO EDUCATION. SAYS BRITISH LAW MAKER

                       LIFESTYLE LESSONS TO REPLACE TRADITIONAL SUBJECTS

 

    COUNCIL OFFICER PLUNGED 100 FEET OVER PLYMOUTH'S IMMORAL MOVES

     BRITISH ID CARDS WILL BE FULL OF EU SYMBOLS. THAT MEANS BABYLON 

___________________________________________________________________________

 

       HERE WE HAVE THE MEANS BY WHICH WE CAN DESTROY THIS EVER

                                       ENCROACHING TOTALITARIAN STATE.

                             THE BEST 84 MINUTES YOU WILL SPEND TODAY :

                                            AN IDEA WHOSE TIME HAS COME

___________________________________________________________________________

 

DEMOS

 

Understanding this silence is critical in a society in which news has become noise. Silence covers the truth that Britain's political parties have converged and now follow the single-ideology model of the United States. This is different from the political consensus of half a century ago that produced what was known as social democracy. Today's political union has no principled social democratic premises. Debate has become just another weasel word and principle, like the language of Chaucer, is bygone. That the poor and the state fund the rich is a given, along with the theft of public services, known as privatisation. This was spelt out by Margaret Thatcher but, more importantly, by new Labour's engineers. In The Blair Revolution: Can New Labour Deliver? Peter Mandelson and Roger Liddle declared Britain's new "economic strengths" to be its transnational corporations, the "aerospace" industry (weapons) and "the pre-eminence of the City of London". The rest was to be asset-stripped, including the peculiar British pursuit of selfless public service. Overlaying this was a new social authoritarianism guided by a hypocrisy based on "values". Mandelson and Liddle demanded "a tough discipline" and a "hardworking majority" and the "proper bringing-up [sic] of children". And in formally launching his Murdochracy, Blair used "moral" and "morality" 18 times in a speech he gave in Australia as a guest of Rupert Murdoch, who had recently found God.

A "think tank" called Demos exemplified this new order. A founder of Demos, Geoff Mulgan, himself rewarded with a job in one of Blair's "policy units", wrote a book called Connexity. "In much of the world today," he offered, "the most pressing problems on the public agenda are not poverty or material shortage . . . but rather the disorders of freedom: the troubles that result from having too many freedoms that are abused rather than constructively used." As if celebrating life in another solar system, he wrote: "For the first time ever, most of the world's most powerful nations do not want to conquer territory.".

 

John Pilger.

 

___________________________________________________________________________

                       

UPDATE 17 NOVEMBER 2008

Sent this email to Chief Superintendent Irene Curtis:

Dear Chief Supt Curtis

 

In accordance with the FOIA 2000, please send me a copy of all e mail traffic sent and received by you or addressed to you from Common Purpose from January 2007. Please include all attachments.

 

Events sponsored by Lancashire Constabulary (training events on Police premises)  from January 2007.      

 

Please send me a copy of all invoices received by Lancashire Constabulary from Common Purpose  from January 2007.  

 

Has Common Purpose offered you any advice regarding freedom of information requests ?   

 

Yours Sincerely 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 

UPDATE 24 NOVEMBER 2008

 

I sent this email to the Manchester Compliance Dept @ : informationcompliance@manchester.gov.uk

FAO Info Compliance Dept

 

Please send me a copy of every invoice received by Common Purpose Limited from January 2007.

Please send me a copy of all email traffic - including attachments between Paul Shannon / Kevin Jones and Common Purpose from July 2007. 

I would appreciate it if you can  send me a copy of all email traffic between the council and Common Purpose relating to this request when completed.

Sincerely

And this email to Freedom of Information Dept GMP Police @ : freedomofinformation@gmp.police.uk

 

FAO Info Compliance Dept

 

Please send me a copy of every invoice received GMP by Common Purpose Limited from January 2007.

Please send me a copy of all email traffic - including attachments between Supt Graham Openshaw / Sgt Umer Khan  and Common Purpose

from July 2007. 

Is  David Whatton  a Common Purpose advisory group member still ?

I would appreciate it if you can  send me a copy of all email traffic between your dept council and Common Purpose relating to this request when completed.

Sincerely

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I sent this request 24 November 2008 :

 

FAO Info Compliance Dept

 

Please send me a copy of every invoice received GMP by Common Purpose Limited from January 2007.

Please send me a copy of all email traffic - including attachments between Supt Graham Openshaw / Sgt Umer Khan  and Common Purpose

from July 2007.

Is  David Whatton  a Common Purpose advisory group member still ?

I would appreciate it if you can  send me a copy of all email traffic between your dept council and Common Purpose relating to this request when completed.

Sincerely

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

UPDATE 25 NOVEMBER 2008

I recieved this email :

Dear Sir,
I write in connection with your request for information below and the obligation placed on Public Authorities, to provide advice and assistance under 16 of the Freedom of Information Act.   Unfortunately we are unable to comply with your request because we require further information.  To enable Greater Manchester Police to collate the requested information, could you please answer the following question:

(1) Please clarify point (1) of your request: do you mean 'every invoice received by GMP from Common Purpose'?

(2)  Please clarify point (4).  Can you please clarify 'dept council'?

After receiving your reply, your request will then be considered and you will receive the information requested within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, subject to the information not being exempt or containing reference to a third party.
If the requested additional information has not been received by 9 December 2008, I will assume you no longer wish to proceed with this request and will treat it as withdrawn.
Kind regards
Corine

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 

UPDATE 26 NOVEMBER 2008

I sent this email in reply to the above :

Dear Corin.

Thank you for your prompt reply.

In relation to point 1, all invoice please

In relation to point 4, all relevant depts. and councils relating to the aforementioned personnel.

Best regards.

 

I then recieved this reply :

 

ref 2078/08
many thanks for your prompt response.  Unfortunately we require further clarification

We asked in connection with point 1 if you wanted every invoice received by GMP from Common Purpose - you replied  all invoice please - Can you please confirm if you mean "ALL INVOICES RECEIVED BY GMP FROM COMMON PURPOSE, FROM JAN 07"?

Also can you please clarify the meaning of the following:

"I would appreciate it if you can  send me a copy of all email traffic between your dept council and Common Purpose relating to this request when completed."
Unfortunately the clarification you have sent has not assisted us or clarified the exact information you require.  Can you redefine "dept council" and "this request" - do you mean YOUR FOI request to GMP or information relating to Common Purpose?  
If you wish to speak to me my telephone number is 0161 856 2529 or if you can provide a telephone number I can contact you.
kind regards
Philip Humphreys
Information Access Officer
 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________



UPDATE 27 NOVEMBER 2008

I sent this email to Philip Humphreys at GMP :

Dear Philip.

Given your obvious struggle with the English language, allow me to simplify the situation.

Yes I require all invoices received by GMP from Common Purpose, from the date as specified Jan 07.

 

When a FOI officer gets a request the officer usually contacts the third party i.e. in this case common purpose, this is normal behaviour. Therefore I request  copies of all traffic between your department Philip Humphreys, and Common Purpose in relation to my FOI request to you GMP Police.

Could you please pass me the details of your superior.

Regards

 

 I received this reply : 

I have referred this matter to my line manager, Mrs Rebbeca Rice, who has requested that you contact her on telephone number 0161 856 2668 or provide your contact number and Mrs Rice shall call you.
Regards
Philip Humphreys

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I recieved this reply 27 November 2008 :

 

From: Philip.Humphreys@gmp.police.uk on behalf of FreedomOfInformation@gmp.police.uk
Sent: Thu 27/11/2008 13:25
To: sean young
Cc: Rebecca.Rice@gmp.police.uk
Subject: RE: request


Dear Mr Young
I have referred this matter to my line manager, Mrs Rebecca Rice, who has requested that you contact her on telephone number 0161 856 2668 or provide your contact number and Mrs Rice shall call you.
regards
Philip Humphreys

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I sent this email 27 November 2008 :

 

Dear Rebecca.

I find your request to move this to a phone conversation rather odd. I cannot make my request any plainer via the telephone. For legal and filing purposes I would rather continue this request for information via the email.

Regards

___________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 

I received this reply 27 November 2008 :

 

Mr Young,

Further to your recent email.  I wished to discuss this matter by telephone in order to explain the FOI process and the information that can be disclosed to you.  However, I will advise as follows:

Question 1 - 'every invoice received GMP by Common Purpose Limited from January 2007'  This question was not very clear hence my colleague requesting clarification.  Now that you have clarified that you require invoices received by GMP from Common Purpose, this part of your request will be processed as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Question 2 - 'All email traffic - including attachments between Supt Graham Openshaw/Sgt Umer Khan and Common Purpose'  This question will be processed as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Question 3 - 'Is David Whatton a Common Purpose Advisory Group member still'  Please note that Mr Whatton is no longer a member of GMP and therefore, we are unable to answer this question.

Question 4 - 'All traffic between your department and Common Purpose in relation to my FOI request'  This question appears to be asking for future information, i.e. information that would be collated whilst processing your FOI request.  The Freedom of Information Act 2000 gives individuals a right to information that is held at the time they make their request.  Therefore, this is not a valid FOI request as it is asking for future information.

I would also like to advise that my colleague Mr Humphreys was trying to provide advice and assistance, as per Section 16 of the Act, and therefore find your comments in regards to his 'obvious struggle with the English Language' inappropriate.  

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact me either by email or telephone - 0161 856 2668.
Many Thanks  Rebecca Rice  Information Access Team Leader  Greater Manchester Police Information Governance Unit

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I recieved this reply 27 November 2008 :

Dear Mr Young
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO:  2078/2008

I write in connection with your request for information dated 24 November 2008, and the clarification we have received today.  I note you seek access to the following information:

·        Please send me a copy of every invoice received by Common Purpose Limited from GMP from January 2007.
·        Please send me a copy of all email traffic - including attachments between Supt Graham Openshaw / Sgt Umer Khan and Common Purpose from July 2007.

Your request will now be considered in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act).  You will receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act, subject to the information not being exempt or containing a reference to a third party.  In some circumstances Greater Manchester Police may be unable to achieve this deadline.  If this is likely you will be informed and given a revised time-scale at the earliest opportunity.

There may be a fee payable for the retrieval, collation and provision of the information you request.  If this is the case you will be informed and the 20 working day timescale will be suspended until we receive payment from you. If you choose not to make payment then your request will remain unanswered.
Some requests may also require either full or partial transference to another public authority in order to answer your query in the fullest possible way. Again, you will be informed if this is the case.
Should you have any further queries concerning this matter, please write or contact me on telephone number 0161 856 2668 quoting the reference number above.
Yours sincerely
Rebecca Rice Information Access Team Leader Greater Manchester Police Information Governance Unit

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Received this reply 1 December 2008

Dear Mr Young
Re:        Request for Information - Reference Number:  CEX/7LWHSL
Thank you for your request for information which was received by Manchester City Council on 24 November 2008.
It may take up to 20 working days (approximately 4 weeks) for the Council to consider your request and to provide a formal response.
If this timescale needs to be extended to consider an exemption you will be notified and kept informed.
If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Gill Wood Information Compliance Assistant Democratic Services Town HallAlbert Sq M60 2LA
Tel: 0161 234 4083 Fax: 0161 274 7007 Website: www.manchester.gov.uk

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Dear Sir,
I write in connection with your request for information dated 02.12.08, which was received today by Greater Manchester Police.  Your request will now be considered in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act). You will receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act, subject to the information not being exempt or containing a reference to a third party.

In some circumstances Greater Manchester Police may be unable to achieve this deadline.  If this is likely you will be informed and given a revised time-scale at the earliest opportunity.

There may be a fee payable for the retrieval, collation and provision of the information you request.  If this is the case you will be informed and the 20 working day timescale will be suspended until we receive payment from you. If you choose not to make payment then your request will remain unanswered.
Some requests may also require either full or partial transference to another public authority in order to answer your query in the fullest possible way. Again, you will be informed if this is the case.

Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter, please write or contact The Information Access Team, on telephone number 0161 856 2528.
Kind regards
Corine Phipps

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

2 December 2008 I sent this request :

 

In accordance with the FOIA 2000.

Dear Rebecca Rice.

Could you please confirm or otherwise in relation to one of your Special Police Constables, in this case;  Special Constable Peter Lightfoot, as to whether he has undergone the Common Purpose graduation course

Yours sincerely

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

In relation to Special Constable Stephen Lightfoot I received this reply 2 Jan 2009 :

 

Dear Mr Young,

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: 002127/08

 

I write in connection with your request for information dated 02/12/2008, which was received by Greater Manchester Police on 03/12/2008, for the following information:

 

Your Request

Could you please confirm or otherwise in relation to one of your Special Police Constables, in this case; Special Constable Peter Lightfoot, as to whether he has undergone the Common Purpose graduation course.

 

In accordance with the Act, this letter represents a refusal notice for this particular request.  Greater Manchester Police can neither confirm nor deny that is holds the information you requested as the duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not apply, by virtue of the following exemption:

The following exemption applies: s40(5) – Personal Information which is an absolute and classed based exemption and relates to personal information which can neither be confirmed or denied.

However this should not be taken as conclusive evidence that the information you requested exists or does not exist.

Complaint Rights

Your attention is drawn to the attached sheet, which details your right of complaint.

Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter, please write or contact me, on telephone number 0161 856 2528 quoting the reference number above.

Yours sincerely.

 Are we accepting such a refusal when Lightfoot is a civil servant? Do they not lose the right to data protection when paid for by the taxpayer?

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I recieved this reply 9 January 2009 :

Invoice No : CA 0089
Date           : 1 June 2007
Fee for       : Attend Common Purpose North West Navigator 2007
Cost           : £ 6000
VAT          : £ 1050
Total          : £ 7050
Approved 7 June 2007
____________________________________________________
Invoice No : AQ 0303
Date           : 13 June 2007
Fee for       : Attend Common Purpose Greater Manchester Profile Workshop July 2007
Cost           : £1960
VAT          : £  343
Total          : £2303
Approved 29 June 2007
____________________________________________________
Invoice No : AQ 0318
Date           : 25 October 2007
Fee for       : Common Purpose TheKNOW 2007 / 2008
Cost           : £ 4225
VAT          : £   739.38
Total          : £ 4964.38
Approved   : 7 November 2007
____________________________________________________
Invoice No : BS 0222
Date           : 6 May 2008
Fee for       : Common Purpose 20:20 June 2008
Cost           : £ 5525
VAT          : £   966.88
Total          : £ 6491
Approved : 12 May 2008
____________________________________________________
Invoice No : AQ 0370
Date           : 5 June 2008
Fee for       : Common Purpose Greater Manchester Profile Workshop June 2008
Cost           : £1000
VAT          : £  175
Total          : £1175
Approved  : [Unspecified]
____________________________________________________
Invoice No : AQ 0396
Date           : 5 July 2008
Fee for       : Common Purpose North West Navigator July 2008
Cost           : £ 3500
VAT          : £   612.50
Total          : £ 4112.50
Approved  : [Unspecified]
____________________________________________________
Invoice No : BY 0753
Date           : 24 July 2008
Fee for       : Common Purpose Leading Beyond Authority Masterclass [Donation outside VAT regs]
Cost           : £250
VAT          : £  43.75
Total          : £293.75
Approved [Unspecified]
_____________________________________________________
Invoice No :AQ 0409
Date           : 23 September 2008
Fee for      : Attend Common Purpose Greater Manchester TheKNOW 2008 / 2009
Cost          : £ 9000
VAT         : £ 1575
Total        : £10575
Approved  : [Unspecified]
____________________________________________________
Invoice No : AQ 0415
Date           : 14 October 2008
Fee for       : Common Purpose Greater Manchester Profile Programme
Cost           : £ 1000
VAT          : £   175
Total          : £ 1175
Approved [Unspecified]

 

Take note here people, this is our money being spent here by GMP...Tell me how does this help catch criminals?


________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

The above came in the post with the names of the people involved on these courses withheld,  they say...'under the data protection act. Now as I understand democracy, when one becomes a civil servant one loses the right to have ones name withheld. I have to say the way in which GMP Police handled these requests was piss poor, I would therefore conclude that GMP is riddled with Common Purpose subversives.

 

On 11 February 2009 I rang Corine Phipps for a summary of the above FOI requests, the conversation was pathetic. I have to conclude the team operating the FOI requests have absolutely no interest in complying with FOI, they are there to give out as little information as humanly possible. I rang Corine again and asked if she herself had undergone the Common Purpose graduation course, her reply was very suspect I quote :

 

 "I am not prepared to give you personal data over the phone; I will not confirm or deny whether I have taken the course."

 

I then suggested that based on her response, I would assume she has, in that if she had not, she would be happy to tell me so, she was now very angry and said she would sue me if I put forward any unsubstantiated information about her, I replied that all publicity is good publicity in this case, to which she again replied! If you put any information, unsubstantiated on your website I will sue...goodbye" With that it hung up...

 

               So ladies and gentlemen of the real English constitutional Jury...WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THAT?

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

12 February 2009 I sent this request To Lancashire County Council continuing a request made last year :

 

In compliance with FOI 2000

Thank you for your prompt response.

So just to confirm, you are stating that the only councillor in the county of Lancashire to have undergone the Common Purpose graduation course is Hazel Harding?

Could you please send me the details of which course/s she has attended under the Common Purpose programme and copies of invoices for the same.

Could you also supply me with all email traffic between Councillor Harding and Common Purpose from the date l Jan 2007 to the present.

regards

This request was to confirm what was sent to me last year below : 


From: Freedom of Information [mailto:FreedomOfInformation@lancashire.gov.uk]
Sent: Wed 11/02/2009 14:20
To: Sean young
Subject: FW: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PB/502/2008-RESPONSE

Dear Mr Young

As per our telephone conversation please find attached our response to your FOI request, which was originally sent to you on 22 September 2008

Regards

On Behalf of the Freedom of Information Team (01772) 531116

 


From: Freedom of Information  Sent: 22 September 2008 15:04
To: Sean_Young@btconnect.com
Subject: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PB/502/2008-RESPONSE

 

Dear Mr Young

Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000

 

Further to your email, dated 16th September 2008, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.

We can confirm that the only individual employed by Lancashire County Council who is a graduate from the Common Purpose Scheme is County Councillor Hazel Harding. Cllr Harding was awarded a place on a Common Purpose Leadership course by the Improvement and Development Agency (IDeA). Since graduating from this course Cllr Harding has been invited to speak at Common Purpose courses in Lancashire on two occasions.

Please note that the County Council has no formal or contractual relationship with Common Purpose, nor has the County Council paid for any delegates to attend any Common Purpose programmes.  The County Council has no record of any payments to Common Purpose.

 

We trust that you find this informative, but in the event that you wish to complain about the manner in which your enquiry has been handled, please write to The Freedom of Information Officer, Lancashire County Council, PO Box 78, County Hall, Preston PR1 8XJ, or email freedomofinformation@lancashire.gov.uk     

If, after this stage, you remain dissatisfied, you have the right to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner, whose contact details are as follows:

Information Commissioner’s Office Wycliffe House Water Lane Wilmslow

Cheshire SK9 5AF

 Tel:                  01625 545700 Email:              mail@ico.gsi.gov.uk  Website:          http://www.ico.gov.uk

 Your request will now be closed as of this date.

 Yours sincerely, Freedom of InformationTeam LancashireCounty Council

PO Box 78
County Hall Preston PR1 8XJ Tel:       (01772) 531116 Fax:      (01772) 530949 Email: freedomofinformation@lancashire.gov.uk

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I sent this request again on Monday 30 March 2009 to g.wood1@manchester.gov.uk to ascertain why they had still not replied to my first request which was sent in November 2008 :

 

Dear Gill Wood

I have not received a reply to my November request - your ref  CEX/7LWHSL.

 Please advise.

 Yours Sincerely 

 Sean Young

 

I had to send this again on the 31st March and again on the April 12009 before I received this reply on April 2 :

 

Dear Mr Young,
Freedom of Information request - Common Purpose e-mail traffic and invoices
- reference CEX/7LWHSL

Thank you for your e-mail. I apologise that you have not yet received a
response to your query. I anticipate that a response will be sent out to
you within the next seven days. If for any reason it is not possible to
respond within this timescale, I will keep you informed.
Yours sincerely,
Luke Dolby Solicitor Democratic Services Manchester City Council PO Box 532 Town Hall Albert Square Manchester M60 2LA
External tel: 0161 234 3529 Internal tel: 800 3529 Fax: 0161 274 7007 
Email: l.dolby@manchester.gov.uk Website: www.manchester.gov.uk
----- Forwarded by Gill Wood/Chief.Executives/MCC on 01/04/2009 14:09

 

UPDATE 9 APRIL 2009

 

I sent an email to Mr Dolby :

 

Dear Mr Dolby
I received confirmation of my request from Gill Wood on the 1st December 2008. I was informed by Gill Wood that my request would be answered in approx 4 weeks and  "If this timescale needs to be extended to consider an exemption you will be notified and kept informed"
 
I was not informed  and it is unacceptable that I have had to chase your department for a response and five months on I am still waiting for a reply.
You are invited to justify on behalf of your council why you have  failed to respond to my reasonable request for information according to FOIA 2000. 
Yours Sincerely

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

On Saturday 28 March 2009, Accrington Police requested that my ex wife and son attend the police station to have a meeting to what they termed anti-social behaviour to which my son and a group of his friends have been accused of being involved in.

During this meeting PCSO Lauren McKenna stated on more than two occasions, that my son was the 'ringleader'. As a responsible parent, I have been aware of the troubles that have gone on over the last few months along with the parents of the other children involved. We are all aware of who the ringleader and idiot is, and took the appropriate action some months ago.

 

I have to say I was angered by the accusation made by PCSO McKenna and rang on Monday 30 March to request a call back from PCSO McKenna, during this conversation I was told she would be on duty at 2pm the following day. I waited for the call, but by 2.20 I decided to ring again. I was put through to PCSO McKenna and asked on what basis they had determined my son was the ring leader and told her we as parents knew who the leader was. She fumbled about a little then said she had not said he was the ringleader at all. So we have a PCSO who is a liar, when I put this to her I was passed onto the team leader PC Hopkinson, I told her what I had told PCSO McKenna, but she of course had been listening and so knew of what I had spoken. She backed up PCSO's claim, that they did not claim my son was the ringleader, again covering up for her officer, I then requested under the FOI Act a copy of the dossier they had on my son, she refused and suggested I did not waste my time trying via other means, I made it clear I would determine what action I would take and asked her to put me in contact with the department that I needed to speak with...she said she did not know...then flapping after I made comment...told me to contact Lancashire police. She then suggested I speak with her sergeant right away then said he was not available! I asked that her sergeant give me a ring when he was available. I concluded this conversation by asking PC Hopkinson had she undergone the Common Purpose graduation course, she after the shock...stated she would not answer the question then flapped like a flappy thing talking bollocks for the next five mins, each time I asked her directly she flapped...I said I would thus assume she had and was a Common purpose operative. I asked her to send me in writing the fact they now do not see my son as the ringleader, she refused.

 

Around 15 mins later I received a call from Sergeant Holdenson after explaining my problem he told me they did not consider my son to be the ring leader at all, so I again requested a copy of the police file, he declined and suggested I cease in trying to get a copy. I have to say the sargeant was ok, but it is obvious they know I am onto them in relation to his officers telling porky's, and I suggested he have words with his officers to ensure they deal in facts and not fantasy. I asked Sargeant Holdenson to send me in writing the fact they do not see my son as the ringleader, he refused, so I must take this further.

 

The knock on effect of this is that the council have threatened my family with eviction on the basis my son is the ringleader, so I am not a happy bunny at all and will not put up with this from civil servants. It is not the police per say, this is Common purpose acting their own operations against my family, my family have nothing to do with the work I am undertaking, why are they getting angry with my family? We must not in any way accept this attitude, it goes against the whole basis of our constitution and Commom Law.

 

On April 2, I sent an official complaint to the police complains division, and a FOI to Lancashire Constabulary requesting under FOI a copy of my sons file, I also added a couple of other requests while I was at it :

 

FOI request

Dear team.

I hereby request a copy of the crime log and file held by Accrington police station in relation to my son which was used against my son in a meeting held at Accrington on 28 March 2009.

I also request invoices of all monies paid by Accrington police department to Common Purpose from Jan 2006 to present.

I also request a list of all Accrington police officers who have undergone the Common purpose graduation course previously and presently operating out of Accrington police station.

So far I have been able to ascertain these officers as acting for Common purpose in Accrington :

PC Hopkinson

PC Ward 3833

 

I also sent a FOI request to Anthony Pickover at the council for a copy of the file they have on my son :

 

anthony.pickover@hyndburnhomes.co.uk

 

Mr Pickover.

I understand that you requested my son  attend the police station in relation to what you describe as anti-social behaviour on Saturday 28 march 2009. I also understand that by your own admission you claim my son to be the ringleader of the troubles you say he has carried out. We are all aware of the actual boy who destroyed the telephone kiosk, threw paint all over the place and destroys walls, throws stones at people’s windows and doors etc, so much so, that many parents have prevented our children from playing with this boy. It is rather strange that your 'investigation' has failed to collect this information, therefore suggesting that perhaps your team are not up to the job you claim to be paid for by the taxpayer to carry out.

 

I have to say that having lived here for a number of years, and given the fact most parents on this estate know full well who the actual trouble makers are... we are at serious odds as to your findings. I therefore request under the freedom of information Act 2000 a full copy of your log of all complaints against my son.

I await your prompt acknowledgment of this email

 

 

UPDATE 31 MAY 2009

 

After three phone conversations I received this letter :

Our Ref/194/09

28 May 2009-05-30

 

Dear Mr Young

I am writing to you today in reply to your enquiry concerning the conversation had between Lancashire Constabulary staff and your son  ------------, at the end of March 2009 in hope I can clarify the situation.

Your son was invited into the police station with an appropriate adult to discuss the ongoing anti-social behaviour issues for the local residents. The perpetrators of this anti-social behaviour was a group of youths which your son admitted being a part of.

On speaking to the officers concerned and on consulting our computer systems I can confirm that although your son was involved as a part of the group there is no suggestion, from records or officers, that your son was highlighted as a ring leader.

 

I hope this letter gives you some degree of reassurance as to what level of involvement the police consider your son to have. I can only apologise for any previous misunderstandings surrounding this incident and confirm to you that I have spoken to all officers involved.

Yours truly

Sgt Brownsmith

Accrington NPT

                                                                                 End of Letter

 

I cannot express how great I feel to have witnessed two police sergeants, who sounded and acted like true British policemen, instead of having to endure the attitude of the many younger minds with our uniform on, many minds who have suffered the hypnotic Neural Linguistic Programming (NLP), under the Common Purpose, and like witted organisations. If many of the PCSO’s and lower officers are the ones undergoing these courses, then the middle management of the police force is supervising officers who are acting for Common Purpose, and worse they may not have known this. Under this scenario, above and below the middle level are acting contrary to the whole ethos of the police, the ethos accepted by the British people and the mandate under which we expect our police force to operate, contrary by definition of the fact each Common Purpose graduate operates for Common Purpose first, is debriefed by Common Purpose in all cases… that is the ‘Modus Operandi’ of Common Purpose, and remember under Chatham House rule, so disclosure of all members of Common Purpose to any superior within the institution they take their public salary, is forbidden. This breaks the police charter by allowing a body not of the police and legal system to have full access to police information, Freemasonry breaks this rule also, somewhat missed in all the hue ha. Under this scenario, as with the squeeze on the middle class financially, what I have expressed for many years now is the fact that this phase of the New World Order in its entirety is a direct attack on the middle section of Blighty. So to the working class, we need to support the middle class, the same from the higher levels of society, because if we lose middle England we are all down the Swanny and under a brutal dictatorship of the likes only read about… and then some, because this monster is a mix of the Stalinist Russian Communism and the fascism of Hitler’s Nazis, so to ponder the announcement by the Green Parties, Jonathan Porritt only a couple of months ago, in which he shrieked that the UK population ‘must’ be halved by 30 million…..ladies and gentlemen I kid you not, it will be achieved as soon as the CO2 capping system is in place, because do you know what ….it is human beings that express the most CO2, by breathing it out and using the energy grid the elite themselves forced upon us with the Industrial Revolution. That’s just the excuse the eugenics psychopaths need to execute the plan of mass cull openly to save the planet, mark these words people and hear them.

 

This particular action by lifeinthemix in relation to Accrington police  is now closed

___________________________________________________________________________________
 

UPDATE 3 APRIL 2009 :

 

I received this reply from Hyndburn Homes :

Mr Young

 

Hyndburn Homes Ltd is a housing association, not a public authority and is therefore not covered by the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

David Perry

Neighbourhood Housing Manager

Hyndburn Homes Ltd

Hyndburn Homes Ltd (An Exempt Charity)

Registered Office First Floor Globe TMC Building St James Square Accrington BB5 0RE
Housing Corporation Number L4461 Member of the National Housing Federation
An industrial and provident society (registered no. 30031R) with charitable status.
A Member of the Contour Housing Group.

 

So ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are now better informed as to what the housing associations are, they are charities answerable to no one and of course being a charity, they are full of Common Purpose operatives, so they are in fact answerable to Common Purpose. I would now offer a conversation I had last year with Kim Smith from Hyndburn Homes thus :

 

Having spoken with Mrs Kim Smith Hyndburn Homes on the 10 September 08, I asked her outright was she a Common Purpose graduate and she immediately refused to comment. I suggested to her that each time I need to speak with officialdom I was always dealing with a Common Purpose graduate in the place of the civil servant for whom we pay for in tax, be it police, council, job centre and even judges, she again refused to comment basically saying it was none of my business. I asked her in total six times if she was a Common Purpose graduate and received a refusal to comment. With that I can assume she is, and that Common Purpose graduates have been ordered to sideline the issue, this is not acceptable by any means.

 

So ladies and gentlemen are you getting the picture as to why all these organisations set up as charities, are taking over our nation's system's? To act not for the UK but for a foreign power...The EU, that is treason, and yes, we need to look at these people as subversives in our country, because they are not in any way operating for the benefit of this country's systems.

 

I sent this reply to Hyndburn Homes :

 

Mr Perry.

Then as a fully open and legitimate organisation you will have no problem sending me a copy of the file you have on my son, unless of course as a charity you are copying the Common Purpose doctrine of subversion and secrecy. The people need to know...

Mr Young

 

Mr Perry replied :

 

Mr Young
I am not going to carry on a dialogue with you. I have told you that we
are not required to do as you ask. The case is being dealt with through
his mother and her tenancy agreement therefore I cannot give you
information - that would be against the data protection act.
If his mother is happy to discuss the case with you that would be her
decision but we will not breach our commitment to confidentiality.

David Perry Neighbourhood Housing Manager Hyndburn Homes Ltd

 

So as Mr Perry clearly shows, the system and all those within it are well on their way to the fascist mindset, they do not see families, they see individuals, and he proves the reality under which these charities operate, secrecy, subversion, and they think they have power. Loverly....

 

UPDATE 2 JUNE 2009

 

After recieving the letter from Accrington police, I sent a copy via post to Hyndburn Homes :

 

Dated 1 June 2009

Dear Mr Pickover.

In relation  to your letter dated 24 march 2009, in which you requested that my son Charles attend a meeting at Accrington police station, then our communication via email, you were pretty adamant Charles was a ringleader. I questioned your ability to ‘investigate’ given your conclusions, you dismissed the idea.

This is the letter from Accrington police :

 

Our Ref/194/09

28 May 2009-05-30

Dear Mr Young

 

I am writing to you today in reply to your enquiry concerning the conversation had between Lancashire Constabulary staff and your son  ------------, at the end of March 2009 in hope I can clarify the situation.

Your son was invited into the police station with an appropriate adult to discuss the ongoing anti-social behaviour issues for the local residents. The perpetrators of this anti-social behaviour was a group of youths which your son admitted being a part of.

On speaking to the officers concerned and on consulting our computer systems I can confirm that although your son was involved as a part of the group there is no suggestion, from records or officers, that your son was highlighted as a ring leader.

I hope this letter gives you some degree of reassurance as to what level of involvement the police consider your son to have. I can only apologise for any previous misunderstandings surrounding this incident and confirm to you that I have spoken to all officers involved.

Yours truly

Sgt Brownsmith

Accrington NPT

                                                                                                         End of Letter

 

Mr Pickover as I am sure you are aware given the last almost seven years Hyndburn council and affiliated organisations and myself, have lets say been at loggerheads, it will come as no surprise to you that the idea that a charitable organisation such as Hyndburn Homes, have the audacity to even contemplate the idea you can dictate any form of statute to the people of Hyndburn, is not acceptable. That said I am not one for letting your fall into this very category without the consequences to which you are answerable, being brought before the attention of the population of this country. Given you now have the police statement above, remembering the police are the institution we the taxpayers pay to do our investigating, and not a charity, which by the way is exempt for any political behaviour whatever, we will get to your illegal actions in the near future, given you now have expert conclusion to your pathetic investigation taken out of your hands, and the hands of the lower ranking Common Purpose (yet another charity) police officers, who somehow  have been educated to feel lies are the way to act in society…what do you intend to do in relation to the situation before you? Because charity or not, what you have carried out thus far will not wash in any shape or form, either with me nor the people of this borough.

Regards

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

NEW REQUEST APRIL 9 2009

 

Sent this request to Hyndburn Council FOI department :

 

Dear Sir/Madame

 

Last year I made some FOI requests to this council, not one was acknowledged. This does not bode well for you as a council, so I shall begin again.

 

FAO Info Compliance Dept

Please send me a copy of every invoice received by Common Purpose Limited from January 2007.

Please send me a copy of all email traffic - including attachments between David Welsby / Jane Ellis and Common Purpose from July 2007. 

I would appreciate it if you can send me a copy of all email traffic between the council and Common Purpose relating to this request when completed.

Sincerely

 

Also on this day after still receiving nothing from the council I expanded the operation thus :

 

I resent the above email to Hyndburn Council.

I sent this to every councillor in Hyndburn :

 

Dear Sir/Madame.

 

I do not know why Hyndburn council feels it does not have to comply with the law, but after making many FOI requests since 2008, this council seems to think it is beyond the law, and refuses to even acknowledge receipt of the requests. This is a serious breech of the FOI Act 2000.

I formerly request that this issue is addressed forthwith or I will be forced to take this matter to a higher authority, and possible legal action. David Welsby and his puppet Jane Ellis, present the persona they are above all legal requirements, I have to insist you the council remove these two subversive operatives from this council immediately. Strange though it is, but this council is one of the worst in the UK, proven by the lack of response by any councillor and administrative department within it. Do not forget, you are paid by the taxpayer to administer the boroughs requirements, not to sit pretty in your very expensive building ignoring all requests to you.

 

What is worse in relation to your ignorant attitude is the fact for the last six years you have been the most educated councillor’s in this country as to what is going on in this country, I sent the information to you all. So I await your response so we can deal with this matter quickly and efficiently.

As a councillor, it is you duty to ensure all illegal activity is exposed and dealt with, anything other than this attitude leaves you in breech of the mandate upon which you were elected

You can follow the process here : http://lifeinthemix2.co.uk/common_purpose.html

 

Regards

Sean Young

 

I sent this to the County Courts :

 

Dear Sir/Madame

Failure to comply with FOI requests.

 

I made my first request to Hyndburn Council in November 2008. Since that time I have made many others.

Not once has the council under David Welsby and Jane Ellis, even so much as acknowledged receipt of my requests.

 

I feel to allow this breech of the FOI Act 2000 to continue, would leave me as a rather pathetic member of the British society.

It is on that basis I request that you the county/magistrate’s court gets involved in this matter.

I await your advice

Regards

Sean Young

 

I sent this to the Accrington Observer (based in Rochdale) and to the Lancashire Evening Telegraph :

 

Dear Observer/Telegraph

 

I first made a request under the freedom Of Information Compliance Act 2000, to Hyndburn Council, in November 2008; I have made many others since that time.The council has failed to even acknowledge the requests let alone comply with the requests.

The requests have been made in relation to David Welsby and Jane Ellis, who seem to feel they are above the law, even the local MP, Greg Pope has refused to act on my behalf in enforcing the requests.

If you would like to run with the story, you can view this years requests HERE http://lifeinthemix2.co.uk/common_purpose.html

And contact me on 07976 653910

Regards

Sean Young

 

In the evening of the 9th April, I received a call from the Telegraph by a very nice lady Emma; Emma pointed out that under the data protection act, they no longer need to reply with the information requested if relating to a named person, we have found this 'change', as the FOI requests have gone in, because a change is what it is. This is a fudge of the FOI Act. As a civil servant paid for by the taxpayer, this data protection act should not count, more so, Common Purpose in teaching leaders, is acting political, this breeches the law in relation to a charity not being able to act politically. So we are dealing in criminal acts here, because to deal in any way with Common Purpose, a criminal organisation is to also perpetrate a criminal act. Why is the Law not only protecting this right of data protection to persons acting with a criminal organisation, but upholding a criminal act itself? This cannot be allowed to continue, and the reason why the government want to change the law relating to charities,  proving the government are fully aware of the breech in the law by Common Purpose by acting politically, not just CP, many organisations today operating in our system are charities, and are protected from FOI requests and many other  benefits; 'Tax breaks', 'Special Status', domestically and internationaly. Serious power can be weilded via the charities,  causing a big case for concern by definition  of numbers alone.

 

I then sent the MP for Hyndburn Greg Pope, this email :

 

Dear Greg.

 

After your refusal to act on my behalf last year, I thought it only fair I offer you the opportunity to redeem yourself in 2009.

Failure to comply with FOI requests.

I made my first request to Hyndburn Council in November 2008. Since that time I have made many others.

Not once has the council under David Welsby and Jane Ellis, even so much as acknowledged receipt of my requests.

I feel to allow this breech of the FOI Act 2000 to continue, would leave me as a rather pathetic member of the British society.

It is on that basis I request that you  MP for Hyndburn Greg Pope, get involved in this matter.

I await your advice

Regards

Sean Young

 

I then rang the Royal Courts of Justice to see if they would enforce this request, I await their response...

Ladies and gentlemen, let us see how democracy in this country operates.

 

UPDATE 10 APRIL 2009.

 

In light of the fact they are using the data protection act relating to personnel, I sent this request again to Hyndburn Council :

 

foi@hyndburnbc.gov.uk

 

To FOI Officer Hyndburn Council

Compliance under FOIA 2000

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Business Department and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Environment & Planning Dept, and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Education and Learning Dept, and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn the Housing Dept, and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Jobs and Careers Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Leisure and Culture Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Health and Social Care Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Transport and Streets Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present

 

Could you also explain in detail how a civil servant, paid by the taxpayer, is protected by the data protection act in relation to public monies having been spent for them to undergo a course under which the course is taught by a very secretive political charity, bearing in mind charities are not allowed by law to act in a political way. This is in breech of the law, therefore to refuse to put forward the names of the recipients involved in any way with Common purpose, who are paid for by the public purse, is tantamount to aiding and abetting a criminal act. In teaching leaders, Common Purpose are very political, thus they are a criminal organisation by definition of the fact they are acting political within the political system.

 

Is it thus not the case, that to refuse under the data protection act to name all personnel involved in a criminal act, is to be guilty of the act itself.

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

30 APRIL 2009

 

I rang councillor Roy Atkinson of the Overton ward Great Harwood, to ensure the councillors had received my emails, the first in relation to the council failing to comply with the FOI Act 2000, and the second in relation to the Academies Agenda.

He said he had received the first but not the latter. he then in no uncertain terms made it clear he had nothing but contempt for my good self, was totally uninterested in investigating the facts of FOI compliance failure, because he said; "your email came out of the blue". Mmm, at this point I was quite bemused by a paid civil servant explaining how he is not interested in persuing this matter. He kept saying he attended all the meetings, listened to what was being discussed and found nothing at all going on he did not approve of. He said he takes letters from residents and acts for them, but not in my case again stating because my email came out of the blue. I am sorry but I am not quite understanding Mr Atkinson's premise here??

 

It was clear to me this probably very nice chap is hiding something, which forces the question...'what the hell do these people do for their salary? Because not one of them has replied to any emails I have sent to them. Why is he not interested in the fact Hyndburn council has failed to comply with the law? He kept asking me it was alright if he ceased the conversation with me, this became very annoying indeed. I think we need to face a few facts here, how many more of the paid councillors are 'doing nothing', not going to do anything, and do not like speaking with people they are paid to represent? Because if we can answer these questions,  we can ensure the country  begins to work again. How is one to conclude otherwise with attitudes such as this, suposedly representing you, is it any wonder the country is on its knees and being taken over by sick people, or perhaps the real question here is...'has it already been taken over by the likes of Mr Roy Atkinson?

 

I then rang Hyndburn Council to ask had my second email to all councillors in relation to the Academies Agenda, been blocked as spam. I spoke with Monica from Member Services , who said she would look into it, she did and told me the IT section said they did not know why this was so and that I should resend the email. I sent it again.

 

I made further requests to Hyndburn FOI dept :

 

For the attention of the Planning Dept.

Compliance under FOI Act 2000

 

Dear Sir/Madame

Could you please send me the planning documentation and the minutes of the meeting under which the planning acceptance was achieved in relation to the resurfacing of Blackburn Road from Willows lane Junction, to the railway viaduct.

Could you also send me invoices of monies spent by the Planning dept, or whichever department was responsible, in the planning applications for the Tesco store and any relevant conditions involved in the planning application of the Tesco store.

Regards

 

Compliance under FOI Act 2000

 

For the Attention of FOI team.

 

Dear Sir/ Madame

Could you please send me a copy of the minutes from the meeting in which former Chief Executive Mike Chambers left his position as Chief Executive.

Could you please send me all information relating to the sale to the building company Jewson, of the land and premises off Hyndburn Road

Could you please send me all information in relation to the contracts won by Barnfield Construction in Hyndburn

Best regards

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

UPDATE 8 MAY 2009

 

I sent this to Hyndburn Freedom of Information team and all councillors :

 

 

Keeping you informed.

For you records councillor sent to FOI team Hyndburn 8 May 2009

 

Dear Sir/Madame.

 

So from September 2007, the FOI team at Hyndburn refuses to acknowledge all my FOI requests. In April 2009 I include the Courts, the councillors, the press, and hey presto, you respond to my request.

On April 30th 2009 I send yet more requests, only this time I treat you as presentable honest people and make the new requests without the hu ha of sending to the courts, press and indeed councillors, and guess what happens? You got it, you are back to your old ways, ignoring my requests…I would give opportunity here for you the FOI team in Hyndburn, to explain why Hyndburn council takes the attitude that FOI requests need only be answered by other councils and system departments outside the jurisdiction of Hyndburn.

 

Interestingly although the two media outlets thus contacted, did reply, I am pretty sure this also was only to cover their backs, I of course hope I am wrong in this case, councillors, given you are now fully aware of the fact the country and indeed internationally, many thousands of people are eagerly watching this saga, if this is not so then I ask that you fully explain your behaviour, or lack of, which is the case here.

 

Of course it only takes an extra hour or so to use the same strategy thus used each time I make a request, and who knows we may just find a real person who can see the nonsensical way in which Hyndburn treat the FOI Act 2000, so if you continue to ignore a taxpayer, my good self, then I must focus all my attentions on this council, its deception, how you all stick together as partners in the criminal acts you have so far carried out.

 

You see from what we know, all aspects of ‘OUR’ democratic system has been usurped by you people from all avenues of public and private commerce, you have created such a network against the people whom you purport to represent, that we cannot bring you to task via the normal legal channels, if you are uncomfortable by the request, you should be asking yourself why this is so, why if all are acting properly, do we find you squirming at the mere thought of having to release information about our town, your financial dealings, and were the monies went too.

 

So I formerly request an acknowledgment that you have received, and are acting on the requests made on the 30th April 2009.

Sean Young.

 

I have to say that the behaviour of this council is in total opposition to that we know as democracy, the way in which all parties and a couple of very dubious 'Independent' councillors (Malcolm Pritchard for one), all seem to be working together against the people of this borough, what goes on here, and more to the point, these people are acting treason against that which they were elected to uphold, the English Constitution under Common law and acting under the Statutes, which are nothing more than criminal acts set forth by a tyrannical judiciary under dictation of the Crown temple which is the seat of power in the Inner City of London.

They did after I dragged the courts, media and 'supposed' councillors into the fray, not by their actions, but to cover their own backsides, reply to my FOI request, which I may remind you took seven months to acquire this reply :

 

An excellent council

as rated by the Audit Commission

 

 

Sean Young                                                                                   Your ref:        

Our ref:           LA/FOI/

Ask for:          Lianne Abram Direct Line:    01254 380109 Date:              14 April, 2009

 

Dear Sir,

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 - INFORMATION REQUEST

 

I acknowledge your request for information received 9th April 2009 in relation to Invoices and e-mail traffic.

Your request is being considered and you will receive the information requested within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, subject to the information not being exempt or containing a reference to a third party.

 

For your information, the Act defines a number of exemptions which may prevent release of the information you have requested. There will be an assessment and if any of the exemption categories apply then the information will not be released. You will be informed if this is the case, including your rights of appeal.

 

If the information you request contains reference to a third party then they may be consulted prior to a decision being taken on whether or not to release the information to you. You will be informed if this is the case.

There may be a fee payable for ‘reasonable disbursement’ costs such as postage and photocopying.   This will be considered and you will be informed if a fee is payable. In this event the fee must be paid before the information is processed and released. The 20 working day time limit for responses is suspended until receipt of the payment. If appropriate, the information may be provided in paper copy, normal font size. If you require alternative formats, e.g. language, audio, large print, etc. then please let me know.

If you have any queries or concerns then please contact me on 01254 380109 or foi.@hyndburnbc.gov.uk.

 

Yours sincerely Lianne Abram Lianne Abram FOI Co-ordinator

LEGAL AND DEMOCRATIC SERVICES

Scaitcliffe House

Ormerod Street
Accrington Lancashire BB5 0PF

 

Hurray says I, the FOI dept at Hyndburn does exist, and we have a name, Lianne Abram, where were you from September 2008?

 

EXTRA SPECIAL...

 

Around an hour after I sent the above to councillors and Hyndburn FOI dept, my son just finished school asked me who this chap was outside, I look and can see this chap taking pictures of my car to the side of the house. Out I go and ask the chap now in his car, why he is taking pictures of my car? he said it looks unsightly, I ask who he was and he says he is Mark Brockbank, responsible for ensuring this area is in good order, I asked why I had not seen him in the seven years I have lived here...the game was up as Mark laughed, 'shit he is thinking'! he is concerned that my car has upped the kerb to be positioned on what is my driveway, said he just noticed it while passing...I asked him to look behind him at the one he had missed, again he smiled and flapped like a flappy thing. Just then two more council workers pulled up to try and break the conversation, pretending to not be councillors of course! Then the police passed by also, how strange our crime is shit, with such 'inspired police and council workers who also just happened to be passing by!!

 

Have you ever heard such a load of garbage in your life.... I get the feeling the council are not my bestest friend, what you think?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

UPDATE 3 JUNE 2009

 

I sent this reminder of FOI Act obligations to Hyndburn Council :

Under FOI Act 2000

Dear Team.

May I remind you of your legal obligation under FOI Act 2000

Could you please give the following requests your prompt attention, i still have received no reply to my requests.

Is there a valid reason why you feel you need not comply with the act?

Regards

FAO Info Compliance Dept

Please send me a copy of every invoice received by Common Purpose Limited from January 2007.
Please send me a copy of all email traffic - including attachments between David Welsby / Jane Ellis and Common Purpose from July 2007. 
I would appreciate it if you can send me a copy of all email traffic between the council and Common Purpose relating to this request when completed.
Sincerely

This request also needs your prompt attention :

To FOI Officer Hyndburn Council

 

Compliance under FOIA 2000

 

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Business Department and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Environment & Planning Dept, and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Education and Learning Dept, and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn the Housing Dept, and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Jobs and Careers Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Leisure and Culture Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Health and Social Care Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present.

Could you please send me copies of all email traffic and invoice of monies spent, between Hyndburn Transport and Streets Dept and Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to present

 

 Could you also explain in detail how a civil servant, paid by the taxpayer, is protected by the data protection act in relation to public monies having been spent for them to undergo a course under which the course is taught by a very secretive political charity, bearing in mind charities are not allowed by law to act in a political way. This is in breech of the law, therefore to refuse to put forward the names of the recipients involved in any way with Common purpose, who are paid for by the public purse, is tantamount to aiding and abetting a criminal act. In teaching leaders, Common Purpose are very political, thus they are a criminal organisation by definition of the fact they are acting political within the political system.

Regards

 

I rang Lianne Abrams on her direct number, she was in a meeting so I keft my contact number. Lianne rang back and agreed to send what she said had been sent before by Jane Ellis.

 

UPDATE 4 JUNE 2009

 

I recieved these extremely evasive and the most sinister FOI responses I have ever had : replies :

 

Dear Mr Young

 

Thank you for your email.

I am not aware that the council received any FOI requests from you last year; however, I am happy to respond to your query.

There is no such company as common purpose limited – I have checked with company’s house website today to confirm this. Consequently there have been no correspondences or emails of the sort you are requesting.

 

Jane Ellis

Executive director (legal and democratic services)

Hyndburn Borough Council

Tel : 01254 380146

Email > jane.ellis@hyndburnbc.gov.uk

02/06/2009) Lianne Abram - FOI request

 

And this one :

 

From: Jane Ellis

To: lifeforum@lifeinthemix.co.uk

Date: 19/05/2009 11:48

Subject: FOI request

Dear Mr Young

In respect of your FOI request, I can respond as follows:

1) There was no meeting when Mike Chambers resigned as chief executive of the Council. Mr Chambers obtained a job at another local authority and handed in his notice in the usual way. There are therefore no minutes to be disclosed to you.

2) The Council has not sold any land off Hyndburn Rd to Jewsons.

3) The Council has asked you to clarify the information you require in respect of contracts awarded to Barnfield

Construction Ltd. Until you provide such clarification the Council has no further obligation to progress this part of your FOI

request and the time limit for a response has been suspended. You will not therefore receive any information from us in

respect of this part of your request until you provide the clarification sought.

Jane Ellis

Executive Director (Legal & Democratic Services)

Hyndburn Borough Council

tel : 01254 380146

e-mail: jane.ellis@hyndburnbc.gov.uk

 

The first reply begins with an outrageous lie as far as last years requests go; they were on this site until December. Then for the gem, Yes Paul we know common purpose is not a company it is a charity, you also know this paul if you are a part of a FOI team, and I know that no FOI team would present such a reply. The reason I placed limited in the request was because I have a funny feeling that Hyndburn does not have a FOI team, this can only mean that the office of Jane Ellis itself is dealing with FOI, this is in complete contradiction to the ethos of FOI. This shows what kind of attitude towards the people of this borough, the office of Jane Ellis operates. This is not acceptable. I get the feeling the shredders have been very busy indeed.

 

The second reply has a interesting point... they have not sold Jewsons any land adjacent to the old corporation building they now inhabit, I will say no more on this topic for now.

Then trying the same strategy as GMP, they want clarification of what I mean when I request the minutes for all contracts undertaken in this borough by Barnfield Construction, I asked my nine year old to read the email and then asked him what it was saying...he got it!

 

When we have the situation whereby Barnfield Construction and business man Stuart Nevison hold two thirds the council control, that's control of this borough in private hands, then on top of that, the office of the Legal and Democratic Services, 'servicing' Barnfield and Nevison...tell me ladies and gentlemen, is this democracy? What power do our elected councillors actually have?

This system is the same across the country.

When the corporate world controls the state and all its systems, we have fascism in place...'WE HAVE FASCISM IN PLACE'

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

UPDATE 15 JUNE 2009

 

I sent again the FOI request requesting information relative to certain departments within Hyndburn council and Common purpose, I sent it to the FOI email address which came back as a failiure :

 

 

Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.

<
foi.@hyndburnbc.gov.uk>:
Remote host said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable [RCPT_TO]

 

Rather interesting in itself.

 

I then sent the requested clarification :

 

Clarification as requested from email dated 19-05-09 :

 

Your reply :

From: Jane Ellis

Date: 19/05/2009 11:48

Subject: FOI request


Dear Mr Young

In respect of your FOI request, I can respond as follows:


1) There was no meeting when Mike Chambers resigned as chief executive of the Council. Mr Chambers obtained a job at another local authority and handed in his notice in the usual way. There are therefore no minutes to be disclosed to you.

 

2) The Council has not sold any land off Hyndburn Rd to Jewsons.


3) The Council has asked you to clarify the information you require in respect of contracts awarded to Barnfield
Construction Ltd. Until you provide such clarification the Council has no further obligation to progress this part of your FOIrequest and the time limit for a response has been suspended. You will not therefore receive any information from us in respect of this part of your request until you provide the clarification sought.

Jane Ellis Executive Director (Legal & Democratic Services) Hyndburn Borough Council tel : 01254 380146

 

To clarify under FOI Act 2000

 

1) Thank you for your reply relative to Mike Chambers

 

2) Can you present the information as to why Hyndburn council has allowed Jewsons to fence and use the land adjacent to its building, given you did not sell this land to them.

Could you supply the information relative to the sale of the former transport buildings on Hyndburn Road to Accrington Timber Merchants

 

3) Could you provide full details of all contracts undertaken in Hyndburn by Barnfield Construction since Barnfield came into possession of one third control of Hyndburn Council.

Hope this gives clarity.

Regards

 

UPDATE 16 JUNE 2009

 

I recieved these replies on 15 June 2009 :

 

Dear Mr Young
I have not received this request from you previously. I have asked out FOI officer to log it on our system. I have received a request from you before for different information in respect of Common Purpose Ltd.

In my reply I told you that there is no such company as Common Purpose Ltd.
In respect of your current query I can reply as follows:

In respect for your request for copy e-mails and invoices between the Council and "Common Purpose" - I am unable to supply these as they do not exist. There is no such company as Common Purpose Ltd, as I have advised you before, and I am not aware of any other organisation of that name.
In addition, the Council is a district council and so has no responsibility for the following - education; health and social care; transport and streets. These are all functions of Lancashire County Council.
I am also unable to respond to your final request for information as it does not make sense. I have no idea what you are referring to. If you wish the Council to consider this request please supply the names of job titles of the people you are referring to. Please identify the course you are referring to and the correct name of the provider of the course, as Common Purpose does not exist.
Jane Ellis

 

And a second :

 

Dear Mr Young
I will make enquiries in respect of your second question and reply within the 20 days timescale.
In respect of your third question I can confirm that there are no such contracts - Barnfield Construction Ltd does not control one third of the Council.

Jane Ellis Executive Director (Legal & Democratic Services) Hyndburn Borough Council tel : 01254 380146
e-mail:
jane.ellis@hyndburnbc.gov.uk

 

I sent this reply :

 

Under obligation of the Freedom of Information Act 2000

Thank you for your prompt response.

 

Dear Jane Ellis.

 

May I direct you to your own website were you indeed do have departments offering services for :

Advice and benefits

Business

Community and living

Council and democracy

Education and learning

Environment and planning

Housing

Jobs and Careers

Leisure and culture

Health and social care

Transport and streets

Please take a look here : http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/site/scripts/recruit_jobs.php

 

I therefore request copy of all email traffic between each of these departments, be they bearing ‘responsibility’ or not, and the ‘CHARITY’, Common Purpose between Jan 2006 to 16 June 2009. These departments act on behalf of the departments controlled by LCC, the point of control is not the issue here.

I would also request you check here : http://www.lifeinthemix2.co.uk/common_purpose.html

 to enquire as to the reality of Common Purpose as an entity, I only made reference to Limited in one email, and it certainly was not the email requesting traffic from the above departments.

If I named people direct you would claim that under the data protection act you need not reply, and as for the courses thus taken by particular personnel, that is what we would like to see and the reason for these requests.

Could you also explain what the problem was with your not receiving my emails up until the point I made the courts and councillors aware of your refusal to comply with the FOI Act 2000?

 

In reply to you email from 15 June 2009, and your answer :

In respect of your third question I can confirm that there are no such contracts - Barnfield Construction Ltd does not control one third of the Council.

 

The contracts of which I request a copy of the minutes, is for all contracts given by the council for construction in Hyndburn, to the Company Barnfield Construction, including the refurbishment of the Globe Centre and Scaife House. We shall get to the control aspect later.

Regards

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

                                                                                                                         COPYRIGHT 2008-2009 Lifeinthemix2.co.uk

 

 

 

 

 

earth3.gif

     

THIS IS ENGLAND 2008

 

SPECIAL CONSTABLE PETER LIGHTFOOT

 

CONTRADICTION IN TERMS

 

 

 

 

 

large_web2.jpgBUMFACE.jpg

_________________________

 

UPDATE 2 JUNE 2009

ON THIS REPORT

_________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________

 

UPDATE 31 MAY 2009

ON THIS REPORT

_________________________